|
Living in a friendly world sounds like a good idea. However, Diaspora Armenians openly
perpetuate racial hatred. See the article penned by Line Abrahamian which can be found at readersdigest.ca/mag/2006/10/hate_to_hope.php.
(Holdwater note: also accessible on this page if you click here.)
My Journey From Hate to Hope
The Armenian Genocide almost annihilated my ancestors. How could I
not hate Turks?
By Line Abrahamian
When I heard in April that Turkey threatened economic sanctions against Canada and
recalled its ambassador because Prime Minister Stephen Harper publicly recognized the
Armenian Genocide, all the anger I’ve felt towards Turks came rushing back. Why do
they use scare tactics on anyone who acknowledges that, between 1915 and 1923, the
Ottoman Turks killed 1.5 million Armenians in the first genocide of the 20th century?
Twenty-one countries have recognized it, and the European Union has been urging Turkey
to face up to its past if it wants to join. I know you should never hate, but how else
am I supposed to feel about a nation that tried to annihilate my ancestors—and is
still denying it?
Instinctively I cringed when a co-worker first told me his wife was Turkish. As an
Armenian-Canadian, I’d been raised with stories of the Genocide. I was five when I
first saw a black-and white photo from the massacre, of a crying Armenian boy so
emaciated his ribs were sticking out. That kid could’ve been me. So at age five, I
decided to hate all Turks. At my Armenian school in Montreal, the worst insult you could
hurl at another kid wasn’t a four-letter word, it was “Turk lover.”
Three years ago, at 28, I met my co-worker’s wife. She was the first Turkish person I
had ever met. I shook her hand and smiled. She was lovely, but when we sat down and
talked, it was not about the past. And that bothered me. I think I expected her to
apologize profusely for what her ancestors did in 1915 or to slam her government for
nearly a century of denial. She didn’t. So I decided to hate her, too.
It might have been irrational, but I wasn’t alone in feeling this way. When I asked an
educated Jewish woman how she felt whenever she met a German, she offered up a guilty
smile. “Whenever I meet an older German, I wonder, Were you the one who pushed my aunt
into the oven? And if it’s a young German, I can’t help but think, Did your
grandparents kill any Jews during the Holocaust? In my mind, I know I shouldn’t feel
this anger. But my heart won’t let me forgive.”
This, even after Germany apologized and made restitutions. All over the world, Holocaust
deniers are shunned and put on trial. Yet Turkey has gotten away with denying the
Genocide for 91 years because most of the world doesn’t know that before Sudan,
Rwanda, Cambodia and Nazi Germany, the Ottoman Turks killed 1.5 million Armenians in
massacres and deportation marches through the deserts of Mesopotamia (parts of today’s
Turkey, Syria and Iraq). Many people don’t even know what an Armenian is—“So you
speak Arabic?” “No, I speak Armenian.” “Right. Your country is Russia.” “No,
my country is Armenia.” The victims are largely unmourned. And last year Turkey
dragged its most renowned novelist, Orhan Pamuk, to court for “insulting Turkishness”
after he was quoted as saying a million Armenians were killed in his country.
Can you blame me for holding a grudge?
I walk into Manoug Khatchadourian’s apartment and hug him. We’ve never met, yet I
feel an instant connection. Manoug, 104, is a Genocide survivor.
He asks me to make Armenian coffee, expecting that since I’m Armenian, I must know how
to brew it—like baking choereg (Armenian bread) or cooking dolma (stuffed vegetables).
I don’t. Still, I have a go, but it turns out thick and gloppy. Manoug takes a sip and
cringes, not subtly. I smile apologetically. But he has survived far worse than bad
coffee.
My eyes fix on a painting above Manoug’s head. A Turkish soldier is stabbing an
Armenian woman. Another is ripping a baby from his pleading mother’s arms. An Armenian
mother is cradling her dead daughter.
“How could I not hate them?” says Manoug, his body trembling. “They killed our
mothers, fathers, children! No, I can’t forgive them. I still live it today.” His
mind races back to a day in his childhood, on the deportation march in Mesopotamia, in
July 1915.
“Have you seen Mama?” 13-year-old Manoug asked pleadingly, but the haggard Armenians
mutely trudged past him, their tongues lolling, and threw themselves into a puddle of
rain mingled with animal urine. They hadn’t had a drop for two days. Manoug had
wriggled through the throng to fetch water for his family but had now lost them. “Have
you seen Mama?” he asked anyone who would listen. But no one had.
The caravan set off once more. It had been four weeks since they’d been dragged from
their homes in Kharpert, and every day marchers died of hunger, thirst, heat—or the
dagger of a guard. Now Manoug was alone.
Suddenly a band of Turkish and Kurdish marauders came riding down with a roar. The
frightened marchers scattered, but many were trampled under crushing hooves. Horsemen
snatched up pretty girls and looted marchers; a few fell on a woman and began breaking
out her gold teeth with a hammer.
Then a Turk started chasing Manoug. The boy ran, but his legs were weak. His assailant
caught up, throwing Manoug to the ground, beating him fiercely with his bayonet, then
stripping off his clothes.
Bloody and naked, Manoug staggered behind a boulder and collapsed. Some Armenian boys
rushed to help him. “Leave me,” Manoug breathed. “I’ve lost my family. This is
where I want to die.”
The phone rings in Manoug’s apartment. As he answers it, I think, How could he not
hate the Turks? My eyes stray back to the painting. I hate them all over again.
As I enter the Ararat carpet store in Montreal, I can almost hear the giggle of my
six-year-old self, climbing up carpet mountains and through carpet tunnels with store
owner Kerop Bedoukian while Dad was with clients.
“This place hasn’t changed much since you were last here, has it?” asks Kerop’s
son, Harold, who inherited Ararat when Kerop died in 1981. But it has. The carpets are
neatly displayed on the floor instead of rolled into fun tunnels for the pint-sized and
pigtailed. Kerop’s office looks different, but his original desk is still there. And
tucked in a bookshelf is The Urchin, the book he wrote about his experiences on the
deportation march. When I was a girl, I had no idea the man who playfully scaled carpet
hills with me had climbed different kinds of mountains in the summer of 1915.
Nine-year-old Kerop couldn’t remember the last time they were allowed to rest. They
clambered up yet another mountain, flanked by a steep drop. His eyes were fixed on a
donkey swaying dangerously under its load. It lost its footing and toppled over the
edge. The boy peeked down to see if donkeys land like cats do. They don’t. But he
wondered why the lady who’d been leading it hadn’t let go of its halter when it
fell. So many marchers tripped and toppled, reminding Kerop of shooting stars.
It was almost dusk. Still they ploughed on. Kerop noticed a Turkish guard creep over. He
seemed intensely interested in someone in the caravan. The guard quickened his pace,
slunk deep into the crowd—and pounced on a girl, drag-ging her behind a boulder as she
kicked and screamed. Soon, the guard reappeared, pulling up his pants, and strode away.
Kerop waited for the girl to emerge, too. But she didn’t. She must have been 15.
“I hated them for destroying an innocent and beautiful girl,” Kerop later wrote in
The Urchin.
Harold tells me now, “That was the first time my dad said he felt hatred for Turks.
But he didn’t hate all Turks.” His family had Turkish friends who trudged with them
as far as they could on the deportation road, Harold explains. “I’m less generous in
my anger than he was. Still, your generation seems to feel the strongest. When my son
was ten, he came home one day with ‘Death to all Turks’ written on his arm. We were
stunned. We’d told him about the Genocide but hadn’t taught him to hate.”
Every April 24—Genocide commemoration day—thousands of Armenians converge in front
of the Turkish Embassy in Ottawa and chant, “Recognize the Genocide!”
I was there as a five-year-old. At that age, do we even know what we’re fighting for?
We do. Every one of the 27 years she has been a teacher at an Armenian kindergarten, my
mom has taught children about the Genocide.
I ask her if she thinks five is too young to hear about this. “You have to put it in
their blood early on,” she says, “otherwise they won’t grow up with that fire in
their belly to fight for our cause. That’s what we did with you.”
“So would I be less loyal to my heritage if I didn’t hate Turks?” I ask her.
“Yes,” my mom replies unflinchingly.
“So it’s okay for me to hate another human being?”
“No, not just anyone,” she says. “But after what they did, how could you not hate
a Turk?”
“But is it fair not to distinguish between the generations?” I venture.
“Fair?” she snaps. “When they were massacring the Armenians, did they distinguish
between the women, the children, the elderly? And today’s Turk is just as bad, for
denying it happened.”
I’m watching the documentary The Genocide in Me, in which 32-year-old
Armenian-Canadian filmmaker Araz Artinian tries to understand her father’s obsession
with his heritage through a personal journey that leads her back to the roots of it all.
Five-year-old Vartan Hartunian clutched his father’s hand as Turkish soldiers herded
hundreds of Armenians into a church in Marash, in the southern Ottoman Empire. Suddenly,
horrifying shouts issued from nearby. Vartan peered outside and saw Turkish soldiers
pouring kerosene on a neighbouring church and setting it on fire, ignoring
the cries of the men, women and children inside.
A woman emerged from the flames. A soldier shot her down. The fire soon silenced the
voices within the church.
Now, inside Vartan’s church, thick smoke was filling the air. The men madly tried to
contain the blaze, but it was too wild. Suddenly, bullets whizzed overhead—Turkish
soldiers had opened fire. The Armenians flung themselves to the floor, but the gunfire
intensified. There was no escape. Tears streaming down his face, Vartan’s father
huddled with his family and cried, “My dear ones, don’t be frightened, soon all of
us will be in heaven together.”
“I’ll never forget that,” Vartan, 86, recalls. His voice trails off. The camera
keeps rolling. A moment later Artinian asks, “Do you hate the Turks?”
I listen closely, expecting to hear “Of course! They tried to burn us alive!”
“No,” he says. “I don’t hate the Turks. Hatred is like putting poison in your
own psyche. If you hate a Turk, you don’t hurt a Turk; you hurt yourself. My criticism
of the Turks is in their [government’s] official denial of the Armenian Genocide. I
think this hurts the Turks because it prevents them from coming up into the class of
civilized nations who are admitting past errors. I don’t feel angry. I feel sorry for
them.
“Armenians must learn that there are good Turks, and many Armenians will testify that
Turks helped them survive. Unless we break through the walls of hatred, the question of
Genocide is never going to be resolved.”
I couldn’t believe it. How could this survivor feel no hatred, yet I do?
Since my first meeting with his wife had soured, my co-worker found me a new Turkish
friend. Born in Istanbul, she moved to Canada three years ago. “You’re going to love
her!” he said. I doubted it.
I call her, and she immediately invites me to her apartment. Walk into the enemy’s
turf? “Sure, I’ll see you soon,” I say hesitantly.
I knock on her door, and a short brunette with a warm smile opens it. “Come in,” she
stretches out an enthusiastic hand. The apartment is Bohemian and homey—save for a
mannequin in her living room. She chuckles, saying she often dresses it and it has
become part of the family.
I laugh—I never imagined a Turk could have a sense of humour. My anxiety melts. I tell
her of my reservations about coming over and ask if she feels any animosity towards
Armenians.
The woman (who agreed to use her name but later changed her mind) tells me her parents
never brought her up to hate, but in school there was an implicit hatred. She hadn’t
even heard about the Genocide there; no teacher dared talk about it, and history books
taught them that during World War I, the Armenians were stirring for independence,
revolting against an already crumbling Ottoman Empire by joining forces with the
Russians. So in self-defence the Ottoman Turks “relocated” these rebellious
Armenians.
I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. If they were deporting the “rebellious”
Armenians, why deport women and children? Why were Armenians deprived of food and water?
Why were girls raped and babies killed? If they were being “relocated,” why had most
Armenians in the Ottoman Empire disappeared?
I finally find my voice. “How did they justify what happened on the deportation
marches?”
“They say, ‘It was wartime, you have to accept that.’ But,” she presses on, “I
found myself questioning, Why are we supposed to hate Armenians? If [their deaths] were
a terrible consequence of a terrible war, why cover it up?”
She found the answers in university, during the classes taught by influential Turkish
historian, Halil Berktay.
“Then it started to dawn on me that it really was genocide,” she reveals. “I
realized there wasn’t one single interpretation of history, as the nationalist
ideology claimed. What do nationalist leaders do? They choose a scapegoat. In this case,
the Armenians. The other side is, the Ottomans were responsible for what went wrong,
which is true, but the government is having a hard time saying that because the Ottomans
are where we come from; how can we be associated with murderers?”
“Has any Armenian told you, ‘Your ancestors killed my ancestors’?” I ask.
“No. And if they did, I don’t know how I’d react. If you dismiss me like that, you’re
closing dialogue forever.”
The problem, she says, is the majority thinks the Ottomans back then are the same as
Turks today. “Now when I meet an Armenian, I feel like making an explanation that I’m
not associated with Ottoman Turks or people who deny the Genocide.”
I must have a look on my face somewhere between admiration and confusion that Turks like
her exist: She asks, “Hasn’t it occurred to you that not all Turks are bad? That
there might be Turks who recognize the Genocide?”
“Honestly…no,” I reply.
She tells me there are more of them than I think. “Then, why don’t we hear more from
you guys?” I ask heatedly.
“When you talk about this in Turkey, there’s the danger of going to prison or being
persecuted. But I do feel responsible for doing something in Turkey to open up
discussion.”
Still, many Turkish youth know nothing about the Genocide, “because the only side they’ve
been exposed to is what’s in their history books,” she says. “Should they be
blamed? Perhaps, for not being curious about all sides, for blindly accepting as truth
what they’re being told.”
We talk for hours, about everything from the Genocide to our careers to relationships.
As I leave, she asks, “It was strange to hear that you hated all Turks. So when you
meet a Turk you actually like, do you start questioning hating all of them?”
The word Turk still sends chills up my spine. But when I left the young Turkish woman’s
apartment, I didn’t hate her.
In her I no longer saw that soldier in Manoug’s painting, ripping the baby from his
mother’s arms; I saw a friend.
But later, when she told me she couldn’t be part of this article, my heart sank. My
first instinct was to dismiss her as being “like every other Turk.” But then I read
that another Turkish scholar is facing trial for referring to the Genocide in her book.
How can I dismiss an entire nation when there are some fighting for us? How can I hate a
Turk who tells me she’s striving for Genocide recognition—even if it’s in the
privacy of her living room?
I’m not ready to say I don’t hate Turks in general. But I don’t want to hate. I
don’t want to teach my kids to hate. In this violent world, I don’t want to believe
blind hatred is the solution. Hopefully that makes me no less of an Armenian—but more
human.
[Close]
Here are some excerpts from that article; “Every one of the 27 years she has been a
teacher at an Armenian kindergarten; my mom has taught children about the Genocide. I ask
her if she thinks five is too young to hear about this. “You have to put it in their
blood early on,” she says, “otherwise they won’t grow up with that fire in their
belly to fight for our cause. That’s what we did with you.” “So would I be less
loyal to my heritage if I didn’t hate Turks?” I ask her. “Yes,” my mom replies
unflinchingly. “So it’s okay for me to hate another human being?” “No, not just
anyone,” she says. “But after what they did, how could you not hate a Turk?” “But
is it fair not to distinguish between the generations?” I venture. “Fair?” she
snaps. “When they were massacring the Armenians, did they distinguish between the women,
the children, the elderly? And today’s Turk is just as bad, for denying it happened.”
 |
Line Abrahamian speaks at a
cocktail
party for the Reader's Digest, Canada; its
editor-in-chief (Peter Stockland, in all
likelihood) stands behind her. Ms.
Abrahamian has written several articles
for the Reader's Digest, and appears to
enjoy a strong "in," allowing such
genocide propaganda to sail through in
mainstream publications.
(Photo: udem.asacanada.org) |
Line Abrahamian expresses surprise because an elderly friend of hers who lived through
those hard times does not feel hatred, but she does. Her elderly friend says; “Armenians
must learn that there are good Turks, and many Armenians will testify that Turks helped
them survive. Unless we break through the walls of hatred, the question of Genocide is
never going to be resolved.”
Brainwashed hatred must be worse than first hand experience of anguish. As a Turk whose
grand father was killed by Armenian bandits in 1916, should I hate back all Armenians? In
fact, from 1910 to 1923 Turks found themselves attacked by Greek, French, Russian, English
and even Australian forces. All Christian States descended on the Turks to share the land
of the dying Ottoman Empire. As such, Turks were kicked out of the Balkans, Middle East
and North Africa. Every Turkish family has more than one story to tell about the
atrocities their ancestors faced in the hands of invading savages. Were the Turks mistaken
to extend olive branches to their old enemies for the following 90 years?
Armenia – A
Destabilizing Aggressor in the Region
|
One visit to Line Abrahamian’s volunteer project norjraberd.org/NJpowerpoint.ppt
reveals that she is involved in an organized effort to grab more land from the
Azerbaijani territory. In their site, the Armenians are shown as innocent
fundraisers for the needy who are trying to settle in their homeland. There is no
mention that the Armenians are trying to settle on recently invaded Azeri territory.
Atrocities on Azeri civilians caused by the 1992 attack of Armenia are cleverly
concealed in her web site, so let’s follow the actual historical background from
the 2002 book; “ARMENIA: Secrets of a “Christian” Terrorist State” by
Samuel A. Weems, a US District Attorney and Judge (ISBN: 0-9719212-3-7,).
“In 1991 ten countries of the former Soviet Union had met and organized the
Commonwealth of Independent States in Minsk, Belarus. Three of the states were
Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. Less than one year later, the promises of the
Russians and Armenians became meaningless as they invaded Azerbaijan. Russia gave
the Armenians more than one billion US dollars in military armaments and equipment
(84 of their top of the line battle tanks, 50 armored personnel carriers, 24 Stud
missiles and other unnamed military equipment) to use in the invasion of neighbor
Azerbaijan. Soldiers of the Russian 366th combat regiment took part in the Armenian
invasion. The United States press witnessed the Armenian/Russian massacre of
thousands of unarmed Azerbaijani civilians during the first two weeks of March 1992.
One million poor Azerbaijani souls have been living in refugee camps since then —
these one million individuals lived through a war of Armenian “terrorism” and
they are the recent victims of Armenian aggression.
Shortly after the surprise joint Armenian/Russian attack on Azerbaijan — the
United Nations Security Council passed four Resolutions (822), (853), (874) and
(884) reaffirming the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and the
inviolability of international borders. The UN called upon the Armenians to withdraw
from Azerbaijan a total of five times. However, the Armenians and their Russian
supporters refuse to honor the UN demand to withdraw from Azerbaijan and Armenia
continues, after more than ten years, to illegally hold more than 20% of the lands
of Azerbaijan.
Azerbaijan has never had a single soldier in Armenia; however, the United States
Congress passed a law stating that Azerbaijan used “offensive force.” in
self-defense of its country. The US Congress stated that this was a terrible thing
for Azerbaijan to do in attempting to protect itself.
The Armenian lobby within the United States gives many millions of dollars to
American members of congress each and every election campaign year. The Azerbaijanis
have no such lobby organization at all within the United States. This is the reason
the Armenians were able to get this law passed and this is why Armenia received more
than $1.5 billion in US foreign aid over the past ten years while they hold
Azerbaijan lands they captured and stole by armed force.
|
|
It is because of the Armenian lobby that the United States ignores the five United Nations
Resolutions calling on Armenia to withdraw from Azerbaijan. Also sad but true is the fact
that the United States hands over to Armenia more than an average of $100 million dollars
each year as foreign aid. The American government should not give the terrorist state of
Armenia one penny until such time as they obey the United Nations resolutions and depart
from the Azerbaijan lands they stole by armed force” writes the honorable Judge Sam
Weems.
The Republic of Armenia founded in 1991, after the dissolving of USSR lays claims on
territory belonging to the Turkish Republic as well. Mount Ararat, the highest peak in
Anatolia, which is located inside Turkey is symbolized on Armenia’s Presidential flag.
Can you imagine the Eiffel Tower placed on the flag of Germany or Britain? However
impoverished this small country with a flagrant economy, they refer to Eastern Turkey as
Western Armenia.
Similar provocations are too long to list. Thanks to the Turkish Army which is a strong
member of NATO, they could not advance into Eastern Anatolia, as they did into Azerbaijan’s
Nagorny Karabakh Region.
Does it fit the UN Definition
of “genocide”?
|
When examined without bias, the Turkish-Armenian conflict is in no way akin to the
Nazi assault on the Jews and Gypsies who were considered racially inferior at the
time, an event which led Rafael Lemkin to coin the term ‘genocide’. Upon Lemkin’s
suggestion, protection of warring parties was excluded from the UN convention of
genocide prevention, so the Armenians will lead you believe they were an innocent
minority group during those times.
In reality, the Armenians took arms against the Muslim civilians of Anatolia during
the chaos of World War 1 (1914-1918) and their strategic alliance with the invading
armies (Russian, French and British) caused heavy casualties on the Ottoman Army.
The relocation decision was clearly a defense measure in reaction to the minority
Armenians’ savage attack in the Eastern Anatolian city of Van.
With distortions and false accusations a labyrinth of lies was built to blame the
young Turkish Republic (founded in 1923). The relocation started on May 30 1915 with
a decree from the Ottoman government, it was suspended with the onset of winter on
November 25 1915, and completely stopped on February 8, 1916. The deportees were
allowed to return back on voluntary basis with another decree by the Ottoman
Government on December 31 1918.
According to American archive (NARA, T 1192, Roll 8; 86oJ.5811) dated April 26 1921,
644,900 of the deported Armenians returned back to Anatolia. According to UK
archives (WO 158/933, No. 5796, 1, p.3) the total population of Armenians in 1914
was 773,430 in Anatolia. Therefore, the claim that 1.5 million Armenians were killed
by Turks in 1915 does not hold water.
The number of casualties cannot be counted for certain, but no one should doubt that
hundreds of thousands of Turks were killed by Armenians and both parties suffered
heavy casualties due to enemy attacks, typhoid and hunger. However, Armenians are
portraying themselves as innocent victims, whilst trying to hide the Turkish
casualties. Their reason for deliberate exaggeration of their dead is best explained
by Ottoman History Professor Justin McCarthy of the University Louisville, Kentucky;
“Any war sounds like a genocide if the dead of only one side is counted”.
|
Silencing the
Truth |
Many leaders who took responsible positions admitted in all earnest to the Armenians’
ambitious miscalculations of the early 1900’s. In this regard, it is worth mentioning
Hovhannes Katchaznouni, the first Prime Minister of the Armenian Republic from 1918-1919.
Even though, in 1890 he was among the founders of the Dashnagzoutiun Party, he stated the following observations to
dissolve the party in 1923;
“It was a mistake of the Armenians to establish volunteer units to fight against the
Ottoman Army or to ally with the Russians against the Ottoman Government”.
He concludes that the deportation of Armenians was a rightful measure taken by Turks in
self-defense. He also mentions that the Armenians massacred Muslim populations. See
Hovannes Katchaznouni “Dashnagzoutiun has nothing to do anymore, Kaynak Yayinlari, 2006,
ISBN: 975-343-453-7. Even though 2000 copies of the original Armenian text of Katchaznouni’s
manifesto were printed in Bucharest in 1923, they disappeared from world libraries no
thanks to a deliberate campaign to destroy them. To this day, its publication is banned in
the Republic of Armenia.
This past April, ANCA led a grassroots campaign
to punish the Los Angeles Times Managing Editor, Douglas Frantz for putting a hold on a
story written by Mr. Ajax, an Armenian-American reporter. Douglas Frantz explained his
reasons as; “[I] put a hold on the story because of concerns that the reporter had
expressed personal views about the topic in a public manner and therefore was not a
disinterested party, which is required by our ethics guidelines, and because the reporter
and an editor had gone outside the normal procedures for compiling and editing articles.
My actions were based solely on the journalistic ethics and standards that we follow to
ensure that readers of Times news coverage are not affected by the personal views of our
reporters and editors."
|
Over 5,000 Armenians responded to he ANCA action alert and sent emails and letters
calling for Frantz's resignation. In addition, the ANCA-WR, California Courier
Publisher Harut Sassounian and other community representatives met with the
publisher and senior Los Angeles Times management on multiple occasions during the
last several months to convey the community's outrage regarding Frantz's “discriminatory”
(in my opinion ‘unbiased’) actions. Mr. Frantz has resigned effective July 6th
reported the Armenian National Committee of America- Western Region (ANCA-WR).
In 2006 the VP of the American Public Broadcasting Service, Jacoba Atlas, became the target of a
similar Armenian hate Campaign because she dared to allow a debate between
professors of both sides. The Armenians feared that it could somewhat counter
balance the one sided Armenian propaganda films aired until then.
Currently, a letter campaign to protest the Hachette publishing company is
organized, because, in their Blue Guide (travel book), with a passing sentence they
mentioned, “The Armenians also killed many Kurds, during the early 1900’s”.
They attempt to hide all Armenian wrong doing.
|
More
Intimidation |
Numerous calls of the Turkish Government to research into historical events without bias,
has fallen on deaf ears. The Armenian side seems to be searching for the slightest chance
to call the 90 year old events as genocide, while silencing the mounting evidence which
proves that Turks reacted in self defense.
Historical facts favoring the Turks were brought to the public attention as full page
articles both in the New York Times and the Washington Post in May 1985. These facts were
signed by 69 world known scholars who were experts in their field. Armenian Diaspora
retorted to harsh intimidation as well as bombing the house of one historian. They do not
like historians. They refuse to evaluate the facts.
The Anti-Defamation League was founded in 1913 to fight anti-Semitism. It has spoken out
against ethnic cleansing in the Balkans and genocide in Darfur; but in the long-standing
dispute between the Armenians and the Turks, it has not accepted the Armenian claims of
genocide. It is the main supporter of the “No Place for Hate” campaign which was
recently awarded to Watertown Massachusetts, a town heavily populated by Armenians. Now
the Armenians of Watertown are using the “No Place for Hatred” sign at the town hall
to protest the ADL.
Abraham H. Foxman, the national director of ADL said he is surprised that he has become
the new target of Armenians. "I'm not going to be the arbiter of someone else's
history," he said in an interview, adding that he does not believe that the American
Congress should either. When asked specifically if what happened to Armenians under the
Ottoman Empire was genocide, he replied, "I don't know." The ADL only takes
positions, he said, on current events, not on something that happened in the past.
Many politicians have voted in line with the false Armenian allegations in order to please
their constituents. Many more are under bombardments of biased propaganda. The Turkish
side of the truth is yet to be heard.
Hate is
Dangerous
|
I watched a documentary showing the sub-human behavior of Armenians during their
attack on Khojaly, Azerbaijan in 1992. Young men were screaming with joy after
torturing their victims. Similar atrocities were reported during the Armenian
uprising against the Ottoman Empire in the early 1900’s. It is really surprising
that some of these butchers were later allowed to boast in US papers about their
role in killing Turks as if it was their contribution towards a valuable cause.
There are confirmed stories of how Moslems’ heads were smashed with stones
and later set ablaze, because Armenians did not want to waste bullets on them. The
Armenian bandits spent time to carve limbs of thousands of Muslims (including
babies) and meticulously stacked the dead bodies.
The obvious dual standard continues to favor the Christian Armenian Americans’
aggression to this day. The media is flooded with one sided propaganda material. The
Turks have become targets of undeserved hatred.
 |
Although her professional
duty as a journalist requires
her to examine all sides of a
story, Line Abrahamian has,
alas, been too indoctrinated
with hatred; she can only
view her "genocide" with
religious fervor.
|
Even if it is the only way to keep the
Diaspora from assimilation, hatred should not be taught because it can get out of
hand. Line Abrahamian’s mother must be aware that mature people could see the
flaws in her story, so she chose to brainwash her students at the tender age of 5.
Testament that hate, lives for centuries comes from Simon Winchester’s book of
1999 “The Fracture Zone: A Return to the Balkans”. The Serbians who killed some
Kosovo Albanians in 1986 by severing off their heads with an axe or cutting their
breeding organs with a razor blade, declared their reasons as their revenge of their
ancestors’ death during the Kosovo War of 1389 against the Turks. What kept alive
their hatred towards their Muslim neighbors for 600 years who shared the same
language and were of the same race?
My grandmother told me stories seem to overrule reason and morals. This is why
breeding hatred should be stopped for good.
In all fairness, all parties should examine the historical events of the decaying
Ottoman Empire without bias.
Hüseyin Avsaroglu,
August 6, 2007
Kayseri – Turkey
|
|
|
|